The workflow is painful.
It consumes too much time, creates delays or errors, frustrates the team, or carries meaningful risk.

Field Discovery Sprint / one workflow / two to three weeks
We study one important workflow and tell you whether to build, buy, fix the process first, or stop. You leave with the evidence and the next-step plan.
Choosing between Replay and Discovery Sprint?
Replay starts with five completed Cases from a suitable recurring workflow and identifies a bounded next test.
Discovery Sprint is the broader option when the workflow, business case, or implementation readiness needs investigation.
Discuss ReplayFIELDRUNTIME / DISCOVERY
IS THIS FOR US?
Start with a business problem—not an AI wish list.
You do not need a company-wide AI strategy. You need one workflow that matters and access to the people who know it.
It consumes too much time, creates delays or errors, frustrates the team, or carries meaningful risk.
The demo works, but nobody is sure how to make it safe, measurable, owned, and useful in production.
You need evidence before buying software, funding a build, renewing a product, or expanding a pilot.
WHAT HAPPENS
We work with the people who own and perform the workflow. The recommendation follows the evidence—not a preferred technology.
We speak with the people who do the work and map the steps, systems, handoffs, delays, exceptions, and decisions.
We estimate today’s cost, time, errors, and risk. We identify what software or AI could do—and what must remain human.
We give you a clear recommendation, a practical system plan, the measures for success, and the reasons behind the decision.
WHAT YOU RECEIVE
Four useful outputs—not a strategy deck.
A plain view of what happens now, who is involved, which systems are used, and where the work breaks down.
The current time, cost, volume, errors, rework, waiting, and risk—plus cost per accepted outcome and the numbers a future system must improve.
Which intelligence should run locally, come from cache, or use specialist or frontier models—plus data limits, human authority, failover, and recovery.
A clear build, buy, fix-the-process-first, or stop decision—with the smallest sensible next step if you proceed.
INTELLIGENCE SUPPLY CHAIN
One workflow may depend on several kinds of intelligence.
We do not assume one model should do every job. Inside the same Sprint, we determine where intelligence should come from, what it may see, how it is verified, and how the workflow continues when a supplier changes or fails.
The result: a provider-neutral plan that connects intelligence cost, company controls, operational evidence, and accepted business outcomes.
WHO WE NEED
The Sprint should not consume the organization. We need limited access to the people who own, perform, and support the workflow.
WHAT YOU CAN DECIDE
The answer does not have to be “build.”
The workflow is valuable, specific, measurable, and worth turning into a production system.
An existing product can do the job. You leave knowing what it must support and how to evaluate it.
The workflow is too unclear or fragmented to automate safely. Repair the operation before adding AI.
The value, evidence, readiness, or risk does not justify more spending. Avoiding the wrong project is a good result.
SIMPLE ANSWERS
Clear boundaries before work begins.
No. The Sprint decides whether a pilot or production build is worth doing and defines the smallest sensible scope. It does not include the software build itself.
No. You need one important workflow, a person who owns it, access to people who perform it, and a result the organization cares about.
Bring a few real examples of the work, any existing process documents, rough operating numbers, and the names of the people and systems involved. We will guide the rest.
Usually not. Approved examples, sample records, system documentation, and interviews are normally enough for discovery. Any access follows your security rules.
No. The Sprint identifies what should run locally, come from cache, use specialist intelligence, or reach a frontier model. It also defines provider failover and the enterprise controls that should remain portable.
No. Your team, Field Runtime, or another delivery partner can use the decision pack. If we build it, the Sprint becomes the specification and acceptance plan.
It is a fixed-fee engagement agreed before work begins. The fee depends on the workflow’s complexity, the available evidence, and the number of systems involved.
One workflow is enough to start.
Tell us what the team does, where the work gets stuck, and what a better result would look like. We will tell you whether the workflow appears to fit the Sprint.
Check your workflow Not sure what to send? Start here MAE@FIELDRUNTIME.AI / PACIFIC NORTHWEST + UNITED STATES