Modeled measurement case

Finance Operations AI: A Measurable Exception and Close-Readiness Case

A modeled measurement case for reducing manual exception work and improving close readiness while keeping policy, materiality, and payment authority with finance leaders.

FIELDRUNTIME / CASE / 02

TRANSPARENCY / NOT CLIENT RESULTS

This is an evidence-ready ROI model, not a claim about a completed client deployment. Every baseline and target is an explicit example assumption. During Field Discovery, each number is replaced with the organization's verified operating data before a business case is approved.

THE OPERATING PROBLEM

Measure the work before changing it.

Finance specialists spend material time gathering evidence, matching records, investigating exceptions, routing approvals, and preparing close status. Reliable software should perform deterministic checks; AI should assemble context and propose resolution; people should own policy and financial authority.

01

MODEL INPUTS

Every assumption is visible.

The starting model

Team modeled
8 finance specialists
Manual exception load
6 hours per specialist per week
Working year
48 weeks
Loaded capacity value
$75 per hour
02

OUTCOME MODEL

Targets require evidence.

What the pilot must prove

MetricExample baselineModeled targetEvidence source
Manual exception capacity2,304 hours/yearReturn 806–1,267 hoursQueue, task, and time-sampling data
Modeled capacity value$172,800/year$60,480–$95,040 returnedFinance-approved loaded-cost model
Close-readiness cycle10 business days7–8 business daysClose checklist timestamps
Transactions requiring rework12%7–9%Exception and reopening codes
Evidence completenessMeasure first 100 cases95% before approvalRequired-document and citation checks

THE VALUE MODEL

A calculation the CFO can challenge.

8 specialists × 6 hours/week × 48 weeks × $75/hour = $172,800 annual capacity exposed to exception work.

At 35–55% capacity recovery, the modeled annual value is $60,480–$95,040 before counting fewer errors, faster close, improved cash visibility, or reduced compliance risk.

HUMAN AUTHORITY + CONTROLS

  • People retain policy, materiality, payment, supplier, and exception authority.
  • Deterministic matching, limits, and validation remain outside probabilistic model judgment.
  • No payment or accounting entry proceeds without the required evidence and approval path.

MEASUREMENT PLAN

Turn the model into evidence.

  1. Baseline exception categories, handling time, rework, and waiting before deployment.
  2. Run the system in recommendation-only mode through a complete close cycle.
  3. Measure time-to-evidence, first-pass acceptance, rework, and approval latency by exception type.
  4. Promote only changes that pass regression evals against policy and historical edge cases.

Replace assumptions with your operating data.

Map the real workflow and build the evidence case.

Bring one repetitive, expensive, or consequential workflow. We will map what stays human, what becomes reliable software, where AI creates measurable value, and what evidence will make the system improve.

ONE WORKFLOW / PLAIN LANGUAGE / A PRACTICAL NEXT STEP